The question of how Mars changed from a once wet world to the much colder and drier one we see today is one that scientists have been trying to answer for a long time. There is plenty of evidence that Mars use to have lakes and rivers, and perhaps even oceans. But what happened to change that? Now, a new study might bring us one step closer to solving this conundrum.
By analyzing the largest-known deposit of carbonate minerals on Mars, scientists suggest that the planet may have already lost most of its carbon dioxide-dominated atmosphere by the time that many or most of the water-carved river valleys were being formed. The new findings have been published in a paper online for the journal Geology, by Christopher Edwards, a former Caltech researcher now with the U.S. Geological Survey in Flagstaff, Ariz., and Bethany Ehlmann of Caltech and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory.
“The biggest carbonate deposit on Mars has, at most, twice as much carbon in it as the current Mars atmosphere,” said Ehlmann. “Even if you combined all known carbon reservoirs together, it is still nowhere near enough to sequester the thick atmosphere that has been proposed for the time when there were rivers flowing on the Martian surface.”
This deposit covers an area at least the size of Delaware, and perhaps larger, in the Nili Fossae region. Elsewhere, only a few concentrated carbonate deposits have been found; previously it had been expected that much larger deposits would be found by spacecraft, which would contain much of the carbon from the original atmosphere, but that was not the case.
The researchers calculated how much carbon trapped in these deposits would be required to account for a previously thicker atmosphere dense enough to maintain flowing water on the surface during the period when the valleys were being formed. As it turned out, more than 35 deposits the size of the one at Nili Fossae would be required. There are not nearly enough such deposits which have been found, although others may still be buried and undiscovered so far.
The study suggests that Mars’ atmosphere was already thinner by the time the valleys formed.
“Maybe the atmosphere wasn’t so thick by the time of valley network formation,” Edwards said. “Instead of Mars that was wet and warm, maybe it was cold and wet with an atmosphere that had already thinned. How warm would it need to have been for the valleys to form? Not very. In most locations, you could have had snow and ice instead of rain. You just have to nudge above the freezing point to get water to thaw and flow occasionally, and that doesn’t require very much atmosphere.”
Other research has provided evidence that much of Mars’ original atmosphere has been lost to space over time. Both the MAVEN orbiter and Curiosity rover have found such evidence of ancient top-of-atmosphere loss. It isn’t yet known, however, how much of that loss had occurred before the period of valley formation. If most of the atmosphere was lost to space, then naturally less of it would have been available to become trapped in the carbonate deposits on the ground. Curiosity has been roving Mars since 2012 and MAVEN has been studying the Martian atmosphere since 2014.
From the Dec. 3, 2015 update:
“We are beginning to see the links in a chain that begins with solar-driven processes acting on gas in the upper atmosphere and leads to atmospheric loss,” said Bruce Jakosky, MAVEN principal investigator with the Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics at the University of Colorado, Boulder. “Over the course of the full mission, we’ll be able to fill in this picture and really understand the processes by which the atmosphere changed over time.”
Observations used for the new study included ones from the Thermal Emission Spectrometer (TES) on NASA’s Mars Global Surveyor orbiter, the mineral-mapping Compact Reconnaissance Imaging Spectrometer for Mars (CRISM) and two telescopic cameras on NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, and the Thermal Emission Imaging System (THEMIS) on NASA’s Mars Odyssey orbiter.
The question of how Mars lost its early atmosphere ties directly into whether the planet used to be warmer and wetter or cooler and wetter (but still warmer than it is now). As this study helps show, it could have been possible for Mars to have been cooler and wetter, but still have had flowing surface water. Mars may never have been a very warm world, but it was wet, and so the question of possible life in the past also remains open. As for the water, much of it remains frozen underground today as permafrost as well as some ice at the polar caps (along with carbon dioxide ice). There may also still be liquid brines of salty water in some areas, the leading hypothesis to explain the enigmatic Recurring Slope Lineae, where dark streaks flow down the sides of steep, Sun-facing slopes.
“This finding is an important step in understanding the history of Mars’ atmosphere and climate, that is only possible because there is a Mars Exploration Program” said Scott Murchie of the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory in Laurel, Md., and principal investigator for CRISM. “It took a combination of instruments from three orbiters to fully characterize the carbonate deposits, and the mechanisms of atmosphere loss are being tested by the Curiosity rover and a fourth orbiter. Mars is a complex planet and the years of exploration are paying off.”
This article was first published on AmericaSpace.